Knowledge and Willingness to Practice Chairside Buffering of Local Anaesthesia  among Nigerian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Amidu Omotayo Sulaiman Department of Restorative Dentistry, University College Hospital/University of Ibadan, Nigeria
  • Rufai Jaafaru Department of Restorative Dentistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria
  • Mujtaba Bala Department of Restorative Dentistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria
  • Ramat Oyebunmi Braimah Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria
  • Abdurrazaq Olanrewaju Taiwo Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria
  • Mayana Sanusi Abubakar Field Office, World Health Organization, Kano State, Nigeria
  • Ebenezer Abiodun Ajoloko Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, General Hospital Lagos Island, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61172/gd9e6k67

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetic (LA) chairside buffering has been documented to reduce injection pain, shorten onset time, and improve patient comfort during dental procedures. Consequently, dental practitioners' knowledge and practice of LA buffering could significantly improve dental practice and enhance patients' attendance at dental clinics. This study assesses the knowledge and willingness among dental practitioners in Nigeria to practice chairside LA buffering.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over 6 months (November 2024 to April 2025). Participants were recruited after obtaining consent and completing a self-administered questionnaire consisting of two domains: knowledge and willingness to practice. The knowledge domain consisted of 10 questions asking participants to select "Yes," "No," or "I do not know" for each question, and each correct response was scored 1 mark, while a wrong or "I do not know" answer scored 0 mark. Total knowledge scores were categorized as low (≤50%), fair (51–69%), or good (≥70%). Five questions were asked in the willingness to practice domain, and responses were analyzed in the order they were asked. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 25.

Results: A total of 158 respondents completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 98.1%. The sample comprised 106 (67.1%) males and 52 (32.9%) females. Most respondents, 96 (60.8%), were in the age range of 31–40 years, and 155 (98.1%) had been practicing for more than 2 years. Resident doctors constituted the highest respondents (80, 50.6%), and the majority (125, 79.1%; 95% CI: 72.0–85.1%) were aware of LA chairside buffering. The overall mean knowledge score was 38.4%, and the majority of respondents (153, 96.8%; 95% CI: 92.9–98.8%) had never practiced chairside buffering of LA, with only 54 (34.2%; 95% CI: 26.9–42.1%) willing to practice it. No statistically significant difference was found between gender and willingness to practice chairside LA buffering (χ² = 0.632, df = 1, p = 0.426). The main reason for not willing to practice buffering of LA was extra cost of treatment (45, 43.3%).

Conclusion: While the benefit of chairside LA buffering in providing less painful, more reliable, and comfortable anesthesia has been established, knowledge, practice, and willingness to practice this technique among dentists were found to be low.

Keywords: Local anesthetic buffering, Chairside, Knowledge, Dental practitioners

 

Article Metrics

0 Abstract Views
0 PDF Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Gordon SM, Mishenko AV, Dionne RA. Long-acting local anesthetics and perioperative pain management. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(4):611-620.

2. Mathison M, Pepper T. Local anesthesia techniques in dentistry and oral surgery. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

3. Decloux D, Ouanounou A. Local anaesthesia in dentistry: a review. Int Dent J. 2021;71(2):87-95.

4. Corbett IP, Ramacciato JC, Groppo FC, Meechan JG. A survey of local anaesthetic use among general dental practitioners in the UK attending postgraduate courses on pain control. Br Dent J. 2005;199(12):784-787.

5. Satılmış T, Gönül O, Garip H, Göker K. A new and enhanced version of local anesthetics in dentistry. Open Access J. 2012;23(5):1-8.

6. Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(3):127-136.

7. Pawar M, Agwan MAS, Lokhande SN, Sutaria B, Sutaria S, Langaliya AK, et al. Comparing patient outcomes for teeth treated with traditional root canal therapy versus pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S738-S741.

8. Nair VS, Anusuya N, Sankar K, Sathiyanathan D, Sane VD, Kanagasabapathy T. Effect of local anaesthesia with and without adrenaline on blood glucose concentration in patients undergoing tooth extractions: a comparative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2022;12(2):123-127.

9. de Souza Melo MR, Sabey MJ, Lima CJ, de Almeida Souza LM, Groppo FC. The effect of two injection speeds on local anesthetic discomfort during inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Anesth Prog. 2015;62(3):106-109.

10. Mackay WP. Combating inadequate anesthesia in periapical infections with sodium bicarbonate: a clinical double-blind study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;17:11-15.

11. Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB. Effect of alkalinization of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection and speed of onset of anesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49(8):72-75.

12. Jing G, Kaifeng Y, Rafael R, Reyes E. Efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered versus non-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block: a meta-analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018;18(3):129-142.

13. Bala M, Taiwo AO, Ibikunle AA, Olasoji HO, Sulaiman AO, Chukwuma BC, et al. Effectiveness of buffered and non-buffered local anaesthetics in inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomised study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;61:351-355.

14. Abdi IA, Kasumba JM, Wabule A, Nabukenya MT, Kayongo J, Kyoheirwe B, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding use of local anaesthetics among non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital. Local Reg Anesth. 2024;17:29-37.

15. Bala M, Omotayo SA, Braimah RO, Taiwo AO, Jaafar R, Abubakar AB, Abubakar MK, Saleh AA. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of primary health-care workers toward NOMA disease in Sokoto. Dentistry and Medical Research. 2022;10(1):24–28.

16. Kaura AM, Fawa AS, Alani Y. Knowledge, attitude and practices of health care workers towards noma in a tertiary institution in Northwestern Nigeria. Nig J Dent Res. 2022;7(2):110-115.

17. Renton T. Dental (odontogenic) pain. Rev Pain. 2011;5(1):2-7.

18. Auld DN, Wright GB. The initial management of dento-alveolar trauma in general dental practice. Dent Update. 2010;37(5):286-288, 291-294.

19. Saatchi M, Khademi A, Baghaei B, Noormohammadi H. Effect of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind study. J Endod. 2015;41:33-35.

20. Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of buffered 4% lidocaine on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind study. J Endod. 2015;41(6):791-796.

21. Bala M, Braimah RO. Buffering of local anaesthesia in dentistry: a review. Nig J Dent Res. 2023;8(1):14-19.

22. Sriram K, Kumar MP. Efficacy of buffered local anaesthetics in dental practice: a review. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2020;8(7):264-267.

Downloads

Published

17-06-2026

How to Cite

Knowledge and Willingness to Practice Chairside Buffering of Local Anaesthesia  among Nigerian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study. (2026). Nigerian Dental Journal, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.61172/gd9e6k67

Most read articles by the same author(s)