Adherence to Recall Visits among Removable Partial Denture Wearers: Motivations, Limitations, and Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61172/f35mv489Keywords:
Removable, Partial, denture, MotivationAbstract
Background: New denture wearers are reported to seek professional advice more frequently than individuals with longer denture experience. It is unclear, however, whether this translates into better adherence to recommended recall visits, which are critical for maintaining oral health.
Objective: To determine whether new denture wearers are more likely to maintain regular recall visits compared to those with longer-term use of removable partial dentures (RPDs).
Methods: This cohort study was conducted over two years and included consecutive patients seeking RPDs at four teaching hospitals in Nigeria: Lagos, Benin, Maiduguri, and Kano. Data on demographics and socioeconomic status were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire (Questionnaire 1). Information on recall visits, factors influencing maintenance attendance, and motivators for compliance were gathered using a second questionnaire (Questionnaire 2). Participants were categorized into three groups: new RPD wearers (0–2 years), old denture wearers (>2 to <4 years), and older denture wearers (≥4 years). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.
Results: Of the 381 participants (mean age: 46.25 ± 17.81 years; 50.7% male), only 132 (34.6%) attended one or more recall visits after denture insertion. No significant associations were found between sociodemographic variables and recall attendance. However, frequency of brushing and noticing changes in the oral mucosa were significantly associated with recall visits (p = 0.026 and p = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion: This study found that both new and long-term removable partial denture wearers showed low adherence to recall visits, with no significant difference between the groups. The primary reasons for attending recall visits were to prevent further tooth loss and to follow the doctor's instructions, while the main barriers were a lack of instruction and a perceived lack of necessity. The most actionable finding is that 42% of non-attendees reported simply not being instructed to return for recall visits, representing a clear target for quality improvement. Additionally, noticing changes in the oral mucosa was linked to even lower adherence, highlighting poor dental health and denture maintenance-seeking behavior among participants. The null hypothesis remained unchallenged.
Keywords: Removable, partial, denture, recall visit, adherence, motivation
Article Metrics
Downloads
References
1. Burt B, Eklund SA. Dentistry, Dental Practice and the community. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders C; 2005. pp. 203–211.
2. Petridis HP, Tsiggos N, Michail A, Kafantaris SN. Three-dimensional positional changes of teeth adjacent to posterior edentulous spaces in relation to age at time of tooth loss and elapsed time. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;18(2):78–83.
3. Kiliaridis S, Lyka I, Friede H, et al. Vertical position, rotation, and tipping of molars without antagonists. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:480-486.
4. Craddock HL. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 3. A study of clinical parameters associated with the presence of occlusal interferences following posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:25-30.
5. Liu N, Zeng L, Li Z, Wang J. Health-related quality of life and long-term care needs among elderly individuals living alone: a cross-sectional study in rural areas of Shaanxi Province, China. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:313.
6. Elias AC, Sheiham A. The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number and position of teeth (Review). J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:649-661.
7. Christensen GJ. Elective vs. mandatory dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(10):1496-8.
8. Azodo CC, Akinboboye B. Removable partial denture use among a selected group of Nigerian undergraduates. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2012;1:30-33.
9. Shaha M, Varghese R, Atassi M. Understanding the impact of removable partial dentures on patients' lives and their attitudes to oral care. British Dental Journal. 2021;1-7.
10. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe M, Dahiya B, Bhandari CJ, Murray L, Marcene W. Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2014;93:20-28.
11. Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabe E, et al. Global, regional and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Journal of Dental Research. 2017;96:380-387.
12. Malta M, Cardoso LO, Bastos FI, Magnanini MM, Silva CM. STROBE initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(3):559-65.
13. Ranganathan P, Caduff C, Frampton CMA. Designing and validating a research questionnaire - Part 2. Perspect Clin Res. 2024;15(1):42-45.
14. Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, et al. American College of Prosthodontists. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:S1-S12.
15. World (WHO 2000-2025) Standard. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/world.who.html (Accessed 18/02/2026)
16. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4.
17. Ogunrinde TJ, Opeodu OI. Denture care practice among patients attending the prosthetic clinic in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger Med J. 2015;56(3):199-203.
18. Kim JJ. Revisiting the removable partial denture. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(2):263-278.
19. Wolfart S, Weyer N, Kern M. Patient attendance in a recall program after prosthodontic rehabilitation: a 5-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(5):491-6.
20. Subramanian D, Govindarajulu RT, Narayanan V, Kalimuthu ND. Comparison of expectation and satisfaction among new and existing denture wearers and correlation of duration of previous denture-wearing experience to satisfaction in completely edentulous patients: a pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019;19(4):324-331.
21. Park S, Kim HK, Choi M, Lee M. Factors affecting revisit intention for medical services at dental clinics. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250546.
22. Fernandez de G G, Ehlinger V, Godeau E, et al. Changes in tooth brushing frequency and its associated factors from 2006 to 2014 among French adolescents: results from three repeated cross sectional HBSC studies. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0249129.
23. Turgut Cankaya Z, Yurdakos A, Gokalp Kalabay P. The association between denture care and oral hygiene habits, oral hygiene knowledge and periodontal status of geriatric patients wearing removable partial dentures. Eur Oral Res. 2020;54(1):9-15.
24. Ghiţă RE, Scrieciu M, Mercuţ V, et al. Oral mucosa changes associated with wearing removable acrylic dentures. Curr Health Sci J. 2020;46(4):344-351.
25. Fitzpatrick SG, Cohen DM, Clark AN. Ulcerated lesions of the oral mucosa: clinical and histologic review. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(1):91-102.
26. Milward P, Katechia D, Morgan MZ. Knowledge of removable partial denture wearers on denture hygiene. Br Dent J. 2013;215:E20.
27. Akinboboye BO, Umeizudike KA, Uzoije U, Arigbabu OA. Abutments and periodontal parameters in prospective denture wearers. Afr J Med Sci. 2021;50:383-389.
28. Preshaw PM, Walls AW, Jakubovics NS, Moynihan PJ, Jepson NJ, Loewy Z. Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent. 2011;39:711-719.
29. Majchrzak K, Mierzwinska-Nastalska E, et al. Comparison of staphylococcal flora in denture plaque and the surface of the pharyngeal mucous membrane in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2016;48(5):1590-7.
30. Akinboboye BO, Malomo BI, Gbiri CA, Ogunyemi AO, Arikawe AP, Obashoro-John OA. Oral health literacy: effectiveness of a homegrown intervention among community-dwelling older Nigerians. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1119.
31. Seó RS, Neppelenbroek KH, Filho JN. Factors affecting the strength of denture repairs. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(4):302-10.
32. Chand P, Patel CB, Singh BP, Singh RD, Singh K. Mechanical properties of denture base resins: an evaluation. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(1):180.
33. Diwe I, Mgbemere H, Adeleye O, Akinboboye B. Comparative evaluation of the effects of yttrium stabilized zirconia nanoparticles (YSZrO2-NP) and porcelain particles on property enhancement of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture composites. JBBBE. 2026;70:21-41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bolanle Oyeyemi Akinboboye, Deborah Oreoluwa Adebomi, Ebenezer Abiodun Ajoloko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Statement
- We became fully Open Access since January 2023.
- Our new and archived materials are available free of charge on open basis and under a Creative Commons license as stated below.
Copyright statement
Copyright © 1999 The authors. This work, Nigerian Dental Journal by Nigerian Dental Association is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.